Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Franciscus Babić of Senj groom of 1847
Marriage, 1847, Senj — FRANCISCUS BABIĆ [«BABICH»] OF SENJ, A BACHELOR OF 21, SON OF FRANCISCUS BABIĆ AND DOROTHEA NÉE BABIĆ, MARRYING MARIA BA[J]SICH [?], AGED 19, AT THE SENJ CATHEDRAL ON 6 [?] 1847 — the same parents as the Laurentius Babić of 1842.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- marriage
- Date
- 1847
- Place
- Senj
- Citation
- (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 228, right-hand page, see the entry quoted: «1847 die 6 [month not read] in Ecclesia Cathedrali copulati fuere. Franciscus Babich filius Francisci Babich et Dogmae [Dorotheae?] natae Babich, caelebs, Parochianus hujas, et Maria Bajsich [?] filia Martini Bajsich et Mariae natae […] Parochiana hujas, viduati?…»; ages 21 / 19; entry no. 41; witnesses Nicolo Bronzin, tailor? Read at about 3x; the month and the bride's surname are not firm. Brother or cousin of the Laurentius Babich of 1842 (whose parents are the same Franciscus and Dorothea née Babich) (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md
The register page
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 228, right-hand page, see the entry quoted.
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
FRANCISCUS BABIĆ [«BABICH»] OF SENJ, A BACHELOR OF 21, SON OF FRANCISCUS BABIĆ AND DOROTHEA NÉE BABIĆ, MARRYING MARIA BA[J]SICH [?], AGED 19, AT THE SENJ CATHEDRAL ON 6 [?] 1847 — the same parents as the Laurentius Babić of 1842
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.