Read out of a register, and not in the family tree

Antonius Babić of Senj groom of 1842

Marriage, 23 January 1842, Senj — ANTONIUS BABIĆ [«BABICH»] OF SENJ, A BACHELOR OF ABOUT 28, SON OF THE LATE GEORGIUS BABIĆ AND MARIA NÉE BABIĆ, MARRYING MARIA KALANJ [«CALANICH»], AGED 20, DAUGHTER OF JACOBUS AND MAGDALENA, AT THE SENJ CATHEDRAL ON 23 JANUARY 1842 — a Babić and a Kalanj in the one entry; whether either is of the lines this archive descends from is not shown.

The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it. The whole list, and why it exists →

What the register says

Event: marriage
Date: 23 January 1842
Place: Senj
Citation: (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 226, left-hand page, see the entry quoted: «1842 Die 23 Januarii in Ecclesia Cathedrali Segniae copulati fuere. Antonius Babich caelebs, parochianus hujas, filius legitimus vita functi Patris Georgii Babich et Mariae Matre viventis natae Babich. Iniuit Matrimonium cum Puella Maria Calanich parochiana hujas et filia vero Jacobi et Magdalenae […]»; ages 28 / 20; witness Franc. Bonafaccia and Petrus Korrenich as chaplain. Read at about 3x; the groom's age is read 28; the bride's age 20; the bride's surname is read «Calanich» (Kalanj) from the first line and from the first line of the next entry's block (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md

The register page

How they attach to the line

ANTONIUS BABIĆ [«BABICH»] OF SENJ, A BACHELOR OF ABOUT 28, SON OF THE LATE GEORGIUS BABIĆ AND MARIA NÉE BABIĆ, MARRYING MARIA KALANJ [«CALANICH»], AGED 20, DAUGHTER OF JACOBUS AND MAGDALENA, AT THE SENJ CATHEDRAL ON 23 JANUARY 1842 — a Babić and a Kalanj in the one entry; whether either is of the lines this archive descends from is not shown

The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.

← All 601 people found beside the tree