Theunis Botha
1711–1782 · Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
| Born | 7 NOV 1711, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa |
|---|---|
| Baptised | 7 NOV 1711, Drakenstein, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa |
| Died | 1782, Paarl, Cape Colony, South Africa |
| Record | @I509793@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 8 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth7 NOV 1711Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
- death1782Paarl, Cape Colony, South Africa
- christening7 NOV 1711Drakenstein, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
- event15 OCT 1730Stellenbosch, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
Sources attached in the tree
- FamilySearch Family Tree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-40001-994088518/theunis-botha-in-familysearch-family-tree
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →
Others of the same name
These parishes repeat their names relentlessly — 94 Marijas and 88 Ivans in this archive alone. These are different people, kept apart on purpose rather than merged into one. Merging on a name is exactly how this tree came to hold a man born after his own granddaughter.
| Theunis Botha | TO 13 APR 1686–ABT 20 JUL 1746 | Swellendam | |
| Theunis Botha | 1734 | Paarl |
Same name, and nothing here says they are related. Why the names repeat →