The Blažević Archive
Perpić

Stephanus Perpić

1861–? · Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary

Corrected against the register

Birth and baptism date

The tree says13 October 1861
The record saysborn 13 December 1861, baptised 16 December

Krivi Put births, image 78 left-hand page, entry 109 of 1861: «13. 10bris 1861 … 16. 10bris 1861, Stephanus Perpić, legit., Joannes Perpić & Lucia Perpić, Krivi put N° 136». 10bris is December: the surrounding entries run 30 November (105), 1 December (106), 7/8 December (107), 13 December (108 and 109), 26 and 29 December (110, 111) and then «Annus 1862». The index's 13 December was right and the tree's 13 October is wrong; the day survives and only the month differs. This is the second of the two month disagreements that were thought to point against the index, and the only one that does not: Milka's (9 October) stands for the tree, Stephanus's stands for the index. Same house, 136, as his sister ahnentafel 7. Read it →

Born13 OCT 1861, Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary
LinePerpić · everyone of the name →
Record@I508653@

Family

Stephanus Perpić13 OCT 1861–?Perpić
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 4 relatives drawn here, 3 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

1 document read

What the registers say about Stephanus

YearDocument The citation, in the register's own words
1861 baptism Krivi Put births 1847-1884 (DGS 5494757, waypoint 9R28-DP8) image 78 left-hand page, entry 109 of 1861 — «13. 10bris 1861 [born], 16. 10bris 1861 [baptised], Stephanus Perpić, legit., Joannes Perpić & Lucia Perpić, Krivi put N° 136». READ FROM THE IMAGE. 10bris is DECEMBER (the entries run 30 Nov = 105, 1 Dec = 106, 7/8 Dec = 107, 13 Dec = 108 and 109, 26 Dec = 110, 29 Dec = 111, then «Annus 1862»), so he was born 13 DECEMBER 1861 and baptised 16 December: THE INDEX WAS RIGHT AND THE TREE'S 13 OCTOBER IS WRONG. House 136 is ahnentafel 7's house; ark 3:1:3QS7-899C-5C1V notes/stephanus-perpic-was-born-in-december-1861.md

Every document this archive has read →

Where this comes from

Read

a register or certificate has been read for this person.

1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.

Every record naming Perpić →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth 13 OCT 1861 Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary
    "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-899X-RNXH?cc=2040054&wc=9R28-DP8%3A391644801%2C392355601%2C392355602 : 16 July 2014), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Krivi Put > Births (Rođeni) 1847-1884 > image 78 of 382; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
  • death

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →