Petra Papić
1900–1902
Connected to this family only through a sorting label
Every route from Hedviga to this person passes through a sorting label — a working note sitting where an ancestor should be. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
A marriage that is not one
| The tree says | Petra Papić, born 1900 and died 1902, has a husband |
|---|---|
| The record says | No marriage. The family record is empty |
The husband is a record with no name, no dates and no events, in a family with no children and no marriage entry — nothing in it is information. AND THE EDGE DID HARM: because that record has no birth date, the living rule cannot prove him dead and withholds him, so this chart stated that somebody alive today is married to a girl who died at two. The living rule was working exactly as written; the edge underneath it was false. The spouse is no longer drawn. The GEDCOM is not edited — across 1,833 published people exactly two families are wholly empty, and this is the only one joined to a child. Read it →
| Born | 1900 |
|---|---|
| Died | 1902 |
| Line | Papić · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I508727@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 4 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Read
a register or certificate has been read for this person.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death 1902 "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-899X-14FK?cc=2040054&wc=9R2D-K6D%3A391644801%2C391920301%2C391921401 : 16 July 2014), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Senj (Senj) > Deaths (Umrli) 1859-1907 > image 562 of 645; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
- birth 1900
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →