Vitus Sekula
1787–?
Connected to this family only through a sorting label
Every route from Hedviga to this person passes through a sorting label — a working note sitting where an ancestor should be. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
| Born | 5 APR 1787 |
|---|---|
| Ahnentafel | 84 — generation 7, a direct ancestor of Hedviga |
| Record | @I511823@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 3 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Direct line
a direct ancestor, with no record of their own read here.
Where this sits on the line
Ahnentafel 84 — generation 7 of Hedviga's descent. Every person's father is twice their own number and their mother twice plus one, so this person's parents are 168 and 169.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
The spine →
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 5 APR 1787
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →