Theunis Christoffel Botha
1751–1814 · Graaff-Reinet, Cape Province, South Africa
| Born | TO 29 OCT 1751, Graaff-Reinet, Cape Province, South Africa |
|---|---|
| Baptised | 29 OCT 1751, Paarl, Dutch Cape Colony, South Africa |
| Died | 1814, Cape, South Africa |
| Record | @I509814@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 1 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birthTO 29 OCT 1751Graaff-Reinet, Cape Province, South Africa
- death1814Cape, South Africa
- baptism29 OCT 1751Paarl, Cape Province, South Africa
- christening29 OCT 1751Paarl, Dutch Cape Colony, South Africa
- event20 MAY 1770Tulbagh, Dutch Cape Colony, South Africa
- event12 FEB 1792Graaff-Reinet, Cape, South Africa
- event2 NOV 1800Cape Town, Cape Of Good Hope, South Africa
Sources attached in the tree
- FamilySearch Family Tree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-40001-1306995899/theunis-christoffel-botha-in-familysearch-family-tree
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →