Teresa Grach
1753–1823
One parent on record here is not a person
| Entered as the parent | Unknown Grach |
|---|
That is a sorting label — a note somebody typed into the parent's slot while working through records. No priest wrote it and nobody was called it. The other parent is a real record. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
Attachment to this family
| The tree says | Mother of Giuseppe Defranceschi (4 March 1765), Franciscus (1785) and Giovanni Battista (1787) |
|---|---|
| The record says | Born 1753 — twelve years old at Giuseppe's birth |
Giuseppe's 1765 sits twenty years before his two brothers and breaks both parents at once: Teresa would be twelve and Johannes fifteen. Either the year is mis-keyed or Giuseppe belongs to the generation above. The two 1780s births are unremarkable.Read it →
| Born | 1753 |
|---|---|
| Died | 4 MAY 1823 |
| Record | @I506125@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 5 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth1753
- death4 MAY 1823
Notes carried in the tree
Reproduced as written, minus the automated copy-reference boilerplate. These are what the family and other researchers put down, not what this archive has verified.
There are a bunch of "Grach" in the udine archives: This one example is of a teresa grach (unknown)https://antenati.cultura.gov.it/ark:/12657/an_ud698941
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →