Petrus Stephanus Venter
1745–1792
| Born | BEF 6 DEC 1745 |
|---|---|
| Died | 1792, Rhenosterberg, Colesberg district |
| Record | @I504957@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 4 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birthBEF 6 DEC 1745
- death1792Rhenosterberg, Colesberg district
Notes carried in the tree
Reproduced as written, minus the automated copy-reference boilerplate. These are what the family and other researchers put down, not what this archive has verified.
Biography Birth Date: Petrus Stefanus Venter was born about 1745. [1] Marriage Date of first marriage from venterfamilie website. From the Venter website. [Ian McArthur - 5 Aug 2015] http://web.archive.org/web/20060517030240/www.venter.net/genealogy1.htm Date and place od eath from venterfamilie website [Ian McArthur - 21 Aug 2015] Sources WikiTree profile Venter-52 created through the import of My Family.Pretorius.Van_Wyk.DeWaal.Potgieter.2011.ged on Sep 19, 2011 by Judy Potgieter. Source: S37 Title: Huweliksregister http://web.archive.org/web/20060517030240/www.venter.net/genealogy1.htm
Sources attached in the tree
- WikiTree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10109-23002881/petrus-stephanus-venter-in-wikitree
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →