The Blažević Archive
Venter

Johannes Henricús Venter

1723–1793 · de Caep de Goede Hoop, Dutch Cape Colony [South Africa]

BornBEF 26 DEC 1723, de Caep de Goede Hoop, Dutch Cape Colony [South Africa]
Baptised26 DEC 1723, Paarl, Caap de Goede Hoop
Died1793, de Caep de Goede Hoop, Dutch Cape Colony [South Africa]
Record@I504959@

Family

Johannes Henricús VenterBEF 26 DEC 1723–1793Venter
marriedJohanna Maria Buystree only
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 14 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

More than one person in this chart carries the same name — Jacob Venter. That is what the source says. This archive does not merge records on a name, so they are drawn separately even where one duplicated entry is the likelier explanation.

Where this comes from

Tree only

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming Venter →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • death1793de Caep de Goede Hoop, Dutch Cape Colony [South Africa]
  • birthBEF 26 DEC 1723de Caep de Goede Hoop, Dutch Cape Colony [South Africa]
  • baptism26 DEC 1723Paarl, Caap de Goede Hoop

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →