The Blažević Archive
Boras

Paulina Boras

1895–? · Novi Vinodolski, Croatia

This person appears twice in the tree

The same person, entered 2 times

Also entered as pava Boras
What they share24 DEC 1895 · Novi Vinodolski
How certainSame given name and birth year only — the weakest tier

Nothing has been merged. This archive reports the tree rather than editing it, and here the tree holds one person more than once. The count of published people on this site is therefore slightly higher than the number of actual people. How this is judged →

Born24 DEC 1895, Novi Vinodolski, Croatia
LineBoras · everyone of the name →
Record@I506424@

Family

Paulina Boras24 DEC 1895–?Boras
married 1917Ivan Krmpoticnot published here
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 15 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 1 relative is named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.

Where this comes from

Tree only

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming Boras →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth 24 DEC 1895 Novi Vinodolski, Croatia
  • death

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →