Ivana Papić (Papa)
dates unknown
One parent on record here is not a person
| Entered as the parent | Selce Other Working Papić (Papa) |
|---|
That is a sorting label — a note somebody typed into the parent's slot while working through records. No priest wrote it and nobody was called it. The other parent is a real record. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
Recorded a man, under what may be a man's name in the genitive
| The tree says | Ivana Papić, sex M, entered as the husband of Viero Lončarić and the father of Miho, born 1873 |
|---|---|
| The record says | 21 of the 23 other people here whose name is a form of Ivana are women |
The same shape as Ivana Blažević: husband's place, sex M, and a name that in this archive belongs to twenty-one women. The likeliest reading is a man called Ivan written in the genitive. Two of them in two different families is the beginning of a pattern, and the given-name table does not yet carry the Croatian oblique forms that would let the check say so outright. Read it →
| Line | Papić (Papa) · everyone of the name → |
|---|---|
| Record | @I509089@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 20 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →