The Blažević Archive
de Lange

Barend Jacobus de Lange

1794–1856 · "Bloemspruit" distrik Smithfield

Born16 MAR 1794, "Bloemspruit" distrik Smithfield
Baptised15 JUN 1794, Dutch Cape Colony, South Africa
Died18 NOV 1856, Bushmans River, South Africa
Record@I501765@

Family

Parents
Johannes Hendrik de Lange1760–1840tree onlyAnna Johanna Maria Oosthuizen1760–1834tree only
Barend Jacobus de Lange16 MAR 1794–18 NOV 1856de Lange
11 siblings
Anna Maria de Lange1781–1802Aletta Elizabeth de Lange1782–1861Johannes Hendrik de Langeb. 1784Martha Sophia de Lange1787–1871Johanna Elizabeth de Langeb. 1789Francina Petronella de Lange1790–1838Adriaan Dirk de Lange1794–1889David Petrus de Lange1798–1882Andries Hendrik de Langeb. 1801Anna Johanna Maria de Lange1803–1878Michiel Daniel de Langeb. 1806
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 13 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

Where this comes from

Tree only

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming de Lange →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth16 MAR 1794"Bloemspruit" distrik Smithfield
  • death18 NOV 1856Bushmans River, South Africa
  • christening15 JUN 1794Dutch Cape Colony, South Africa

Notes carried in the tree

Reproduced as written, minus the automated copy-reference boilerplate. These are what the family and other researchers put down, not what this archive has verified.

Sterf Kennis: https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSQF-CS8N-8?mode=g&i=177

Sources attached in the tree

  • Geni World Family Tree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-40000-357954534/barend-jacobus-de-lange-in-geni-world-family-tree
  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1502956_OYYV7P63RUKBLRWF3LK3A7O4ER2UJPY_OYYV7P63RUKBLRWF3LK3A7O4ER2UJPY/barend-jacobus-de-lange
  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-5000487_OYYV7ZJ3PWRF5MDO6XYUGMJL4GCDMQI_OYYV7ZJ3PWRF5MDO6XYUGMJL4GCDMQI/barend-jacobus-de-lange

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →

Others of the same name

These parishes repeat their names relentlessly — 94 Marijas and 88 Ivans in this archive alone. These are different people, kept apart on purpose rather than merged into one. Merging on a name is exactly how this tree came to hold a man born after his own granddaughter.

Barend Jacobus de LangeABT 1763–1872de Caep de Goede Hoop

Same name, and nothing here says they are related. Why the names repeat →