Ante Blažević
dates unknown
Connected to this family only through a sorting label
Every route from Hedviga to this person passes through a sorting label — a working note sitting where an ancestor should be. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
Named as a man, recorded and married as a woman
| The tree says | Ante Blažević, sex F, entered as the wife of Antona Blažević and the mother of Tereza |
|---|---|
| The record says | Every one of the 47 other people in this archive whose name is a form of Ante is a man |
Here the sex field and the marriage agree with each other and the name is the lone dissenter, which points the other way from most of these: it is likelier the name that is wrong than the sex. A woman entered under a masculine form, or under her husband's forename, would look exactly like this. Nothing external has been read, and the tree is not altered. Read it →
| Line | Blažević · everyone of the name → |
|---|---|
| Record | @I508527@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 2 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →