Tonka Miletic
1880–? · Povile 19, Croatia
Recorded a man, under a woman's diminutive
| The tree says | Tonka Miletic, born 1880 at Povile 19 — sex recorded M, child of Toma Miletić and Marija Kalanj |
|---|---|
| The record says | Tonka is the Croatian diminutive of Antonija, and all 18 other people here bearing a form of that name are women |
The father's name is Toma, and Tonka is not its diminutive — that is Tonko. Tonka belongs to Antonija, which is how this archive's given-name table files it and how the 18 other bearers here are recorded. Nothing has been read out of a Povile register; the contradiction is internal.Read it →
| Born | 1880, Povile 19, Croatia |
|---|---|
| Record | @I512749@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 4 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth1880Povile 19, Croatia"Ledenice, Modrus-Fiume, Hungary records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-899X-KQLP?view=explore : Feb 12, 2026), image 313 of 342; Hrvatski državni arhiv u Zagrebu. Image Group Number: 005494765
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →