Thomas Van Den Broecke
1563–1628 · Opwijk, België
| Born | 1563, Opwijk, België |
|---|---|
| Baptised | 1563, Opwijk, Brabant Flamand, Belgique |
| Died | 3 MAY 1628, Opwijk, België |
| Buried | in de kerk van Opwijk. |
| Occupation | Kerkmeester (1605), Schen (1612, 1622-1623), leenman op hof ter, Kerkmeester (1605), Schepen (1612, 1622-1623), leenman op hof ter Kerkmeester 1605-1606, Schepen 1612 en 1622-1623 van Opwijk, Leenman 1614 op Hof ter Hoeven te Nijverseel. |
| Record | @I511949@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 2 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth1563Opwijk, België
- christening1563Opwijk, Brabant Flamand, Belgique
- death3 MAY 1628Opwijk, België
- burial5 MAY 1628in de kerk van Opwijk.
Sources attached in the tree
- LOWIES Web Site — https://www.myheritage.com/profile-OYYV7PK3JEFFLT5QPJRW4UM43HD5QYQ-1558384/thomas-van-den-broecke
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →