Stephanus Francois Booyzen
1875–1940
| Born | 1875 |
|---|---|
| Died | 14 MAY 1940, Pretoria South Africa |
| Record | @I505526@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 13 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
More than one person in this chart carries the same name — Petrus Jacobus Booysen, Johanna Catharina Booysen. That is what the source says. This archive does not merge records on a name, so they are drawn separately even where one duplicated entry is the likelier explanation.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth1875
- death14 MAY 1940Pretoria South Africa"South Africa, Transvaal, Probate Records from the Master of the Supreme Court, 1869-1958," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSSD-V3DY-J?cc=2520237&wc=Q6VB-BY5%3A1590242853 : 6 April 2020), 007820971 > image 571 of 2149; Pietermaritzburg Archives (formerly Natal State Archives), South Africa.
Notes carried in the tree
Reproduced as written, minus the automated copy-reference boilerplate. These are what the family and other researchers put down, not what this archive has verified.
are these the same prisoner of war data? https://search.findmypast.co.uk/record?id=GBM%2FPOW-GALLIP%2F15-0273_GB-SRY_WO-108-WAR-OFFICE-CORRESPONDENCE-A-WO_108-368-1896-1913%2F00442&parentid=GBM%2FPOW-JAC2BOER%2F41325425
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →