Nikola Kalanj
1888–1890 · Klenovica 22, Klenovica, Croatia
Recorded a woman, under a man's name
| The tree says | Nikola Kalanj, born 1888 and died 1890 at Klenovica 22 — sex recorded F, child of Jandre Joso Kalanj and Manda Komadina |
|---|---|
| The record says | 28 of the 29 other people here whose name is a form of Nikola are men |
A child who lived two years leaves nothing else to argue from: no marriage, no occupation, no burial entry read here. The name and the sex field are the entire record of who this child was, and they do not agree. Read it →
| Born | 1888, Klenovica 22, Klenovica, Croatia |
|---|---|
| Died | 1890 |
| Line | Kalanj · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I512651@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 3 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 1888 Klenovica 22, Klenovica, Croatia "Ledenice, Modrus-Fiume, Hungary records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G99X-KQJV?view=explore : Feb 11, 2026), image 111 of 217; Hrvatski državni arhiv u Zagrebu. Image Group Number: 005494765
- death 1890
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →