The Blažević Archive
van der Merwe

Johannes Lodevicus van der Merwe

1796–1846 · Paarl, Drakenstein, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa

Born29 AUG 1796, Paarl, Drakenstein, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
Baptised16 APR 1796, Paarl, Drakenstein, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
Died6 JUN 1846, Surie, Kamdeboo, Graaff-Reinet, Kaapkolonie, Suid Afrika
Record@I510287@

Family

Johannes Lodevicus van der Merwe29 AUG 1796–6 JUN 1846van der Merwe
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 9 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

More than one person in this chart carries the same name — Anna Maria van der Merwe. That is what the source says. This archive does not merge records on a name, so they are drawn separately even where one duplicated entry is the likelier explanation.

Where this comes from

Tree only

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming van der Merwe →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • christening16 APR 1796Paarl, Drakenstein, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
  • birth29 AUG 1796Paarl, Drakenstein, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
  • death6 JUN 1846Surie, Kamdeboo, Graaff-Reinet, Kaapkolonie, Suid Afrika

Sources attached in the tree

  • FamilySearch Family Tree

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →