The Blažević Archive
Sneyd

James Goulbourn Sneyd

1840–1925 · Kempsey, Kempsey Shire Council, New South Wales, Australia

Born6 JUN 1840, Kempsey, Kempsey Shire Council, New South Wales, Australia
Died6 DEC 1925, Emmaville District, New South Wales, Australia
BuriedEmmaville Cemetery, New South Wales, Australia
Record@I675@

Family

James Goulbourn Sneyd6 JUN 1840–6 DEC 1925Sneyd
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 10 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

Where this comes from

Tree only

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming Sneyd →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth6 JUN 1840Kempsey, Kempsey Shire Council, New South Wales, Australia
  • death6 DEC 1925Emmaville District, New South Wales, Australia
  • burial1925Emmaville Cemetery, New South Wales, Australia
    "Australia Cemetery Inscriptions, 1802-2005," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9LB-FQF9?cc=2115584 : 24 January 2018), > image 1 of 1; From "Australia, Cemetery Inscriptions, 1802-2005." Database with images. Citing Jim and Alison Rogers : n.d. Citing various cemeteries, Australia.

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →