James Atwell
1853–1907 · St. Pauls Hammersmith, Middlesex, england
| Born | 29 MAR 1853, St. Pauls Hammersmith, Middlesex, england |
|---|---|
| Died | 16 JUL 1907, Toowoomba |
| Buried | Interred drayton and toowoomba cemetery pres-001-0024, Toowoomba Queensland |
| Occupation | line inspector |
| Record | @I503648@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 18 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth29 MAR 1853St. Pauls Hammersmith, Middlesex, england
- death16 JUL 1907Toowoomba
- burialInterred drayton and toowoomba cemetery pres-001-0024, Toowoomba QueenslandInterred drayton and toowoomba cemetery pres-001-0024
Notes carried in the tree
Reproduced as written, minus the automated copy-reference boilerplate. These are what the family and other researchers put down, not what this archive has verified.
Came to Australia in Merchant Navy and deserted
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →