The Blažević Archive
Kovačina

Jakomina Anna Kovačina

1902–1987 · Crikvenica, Croatia

Born16 JUL 1902, Crikvenica, Croatia
Died5 SEP 1987, Los Angeles, California, United States
BuriedRancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
Record@I166@

Family

Jakomina Anna Kovačina16 JUL 1902–5 SEP 1987Kovačina
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 5 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

Where this comes from

Tree only

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming Kovačina →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth16 JUL 1902Crikvenica, Croatia
  • death5 SEP 1987Los Angeles, California, United States
  • immigration1 OCT 1923New York, New York, United States
  • burial1987Rancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
  • emigrationLe Havre

Sources attached in the tree

  • Parisi Family Site — https://www.myheritage.com/profile-OYYV6MOT7BEXEQBBEIMFT6WSG54Z6BA-2000007/jakomina-anna-alafetich-born-kovacina
  • FamilySearch Family Tree
  • California, County Marriages, 1850-1952
  • U.S. Social Security Death Index (SSDI)
  • U.S. Social Security Death Index (SSDI)
  • U.S. Social Security Applications and Claims, 1936-2007

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →