Hannah SANIGER
1805–1873 · Berkley, Gloucester, England
| Born | 23 JUL 1805, Berkley, Gloucester, England |
|---|---|
| Baptised | 23 JUL 1808, Berkeley, Gloucester, Eng. |
| Died | 4 JUL 1873, Rockhampton, AU |
| Buried | Lutwyche, Queensland, Australia |
| Record | @I685@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 16 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- burialLutwyche, Queensland, Australia
- birth23 JUL 1805Berkley, Gloucester, England
- death4 JUL 1873Rockhampton, AU
- christening23 JUL 1808Berkeley, Gloucester, Eng.
Sources attached in the tree
- Langford Family Site (23andMe) — Hannah Wakefield (born Saniger)
- FamilySearch Family Tree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-40001-157798879/hannah-wakefield-born-sanigar-in-familysearch-family-tree
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →