Diederik Johannes Hattingh
1766–1842 · Tulbagh, Breede River DC, Western Cape, South Africa
| Born | 20 AUG 1766, Tulbagh, Breede River DC, Western Cape, South Africa |
|---|---|
| Baptised | 18 OCT 1767, Wellington, Western Cape, South Africa |
| Died | 8 SEP 1842, Prince Albert, Western Cape, South Africa |
| Record | @I505747@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 11 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth20 AUG 1766Tulbagh, Breede River DC, Western Cape, South Africa
- baptism18 OCT 1767Wellington, Western Cape, South Africa
- event17 OCT 1790Kaap, Suid AfrikaEhepartner: Isabella Hattingh (geb. Nel)
- death8 SEP 1842Prince Albert, Western Cape, South Africa
Sources attached in the tree
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1531912_OYYV7DSKWKA6QFIXXEFVDJ2SE5S5A4Q_OYYV7DSKWKA6QFIXXEFVDJ2SE5S5A4Q/diederik-johannes-hattingh-b8c9
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →