Catharina (van Malabar) Claasen
1673–1714 · Malabar, India
| Born | BEF 29 OCT 1673, Malabar, India |
|---|---|
| Baptised | 29 APR 1668, Cape, Cape Province, South Africa |
| Died | 1714, Cape Province, South Africa |
| Occupation | Freed slave of Jan van Riebeeck, , afkomstig van malabar Slave of Maria de Bucquoij) |
| Record | @I505810@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 5 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birthBEF 29 OCT 1673Malabar, India
- baptism29 OCT 1673Cape Town, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
- christening29 APR 1668Cape, Cape Province, South Africa
- residenceABT 1656
- immigration21 FEB 1657Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
- death1714Cape Province, South Africa
Sources attached in the tree
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1502582_OYYV6XMVAJXJJZUIVGVJCL5FLCUDUQQ_OYYV6XMVAJXJJZUIVGVJCL5FLCUDUQQ/catharina-van-malabar-vermeulen-born-claasen
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →