Anna Grgurić
1871–? · Ledenice, 27, Croatia
Recorded a man, under a woman's name
| The tree says | Anna Grgurić, born 1 February 1871 at Ledenice 27 — sex recorded M, child of Andreas Grgurić and Maria Kalanj |
|---|---|
| The record says | Anna is borne by 51 people in this archive and every one of the 51 is a woman |
There is no marriage, no trade and no stone here to speak for either field, so the name and the sex are the whole of the evidence and they disagree. She has no page of her own — she is named in her parents' family and nowhere else — which is exactly the kind of person this archive has three times forgotten to check.Read it →
| Born | 1 FEB 1871, Ledenice, 27, Croatia |
|---|---|
| Record | @I512813@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 7 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth1 FEB 1871Ledenice, 27, Croatia"Ledenice, Modrus-Fiume, Hungary records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-899X-K74F?view=explore : Feb 15, 2026), image 148 of 342; Hrvatski državni arhiv u Zagrebu. Image Group Number: 005494765
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →