Angela van Bengale
1648–1720 · Ganges Delta, Bengal, Bangladesh, India
| Born | ABT 1648, Ganges Delta, Bengal, Bangladesh, India |
|---|---|
| Baptised | 29 APR 1668, Cape Town, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa |
| Died | BEF 18 JUL 1720, Cape Town, Caep de Goede Hoop, South Africa |
| Occupation | freed slave of Abraham Gabbema and widow of Domingo, came on "Amersfoort", Indian slave from Bengal, Slave |
| Record | @I511944@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 1 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birthABT 1648Ganges Delta, Bengal, Bangladesh, India
- baptism29 APR 1668Cape Town, Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
- deathBEF 18 JUL 1720Cape Town, Caep de Goede Hoop, South Africa
Sources attached in the tree
- Geni World Family Tree
- van zyl Web Site — https://www.myheritage.com/profile-OYYV6YDCEQU3P5TPILN4XXRKC3X33OQ-1505649/sm-angela-van-as-a-born-van-bengale
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →