Theresia Babić aged 14 died Senj December 1856
Death, 20 December 1856, Senj — THERESIA BABIĆ, AGED 14 [BORN ABOUT 1842], LEGITIMATE DAUGHTER OF THE MASON AUGUSTINUS BABIĆ, DIED OF A WASTING FEVER AT SENJ ON 20 DECEMBER 1856, WITH THE SACRAMENTS, BURIED AT S. VITUS — an entry of the Latin-language 1856 pages of the Senj death register (Knjiga Mertvih, Br. 1118); the mother is not named.
What the register says
- Event
- death
- Date
- 20 December 1856
- Place
- Senj
- Citation
- (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 577, right-hand page, 1856 December, twentieth day, entry 109 on 577R: «Anno Domini 1856 die 20ma Decembris Segniae moriantium Sacramentis provisa obiit: Theresia filia legitima murarii Augustini Babich, 14 Annorum, e febri depascente, et servato praescripto termino in communi Coemeterio St. Viti sepulta est, comitante: Antonio Lukovich Cooperatore» (entry number (109) in the margin). The Latin-language 1856 pages of the Senj death register (the book «Knjiga Mertvih od God. 1849», Državni arhiv Zagreb, Zbirka matičnih knjiga Br. 1118; entries written out in full), image 577 right page. Read at full page scale (about 1x; the name, the father's occupation and name «murarii Augustini Babich», the age and the cause legible). A girl born about 1842, a daughter of a mason Augustinus Babić of Senj (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md
The register page
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 577, right-hand page, 1856 December, twentieth day, entry 109 on 577R.
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
THERESIA BABIĆ, AGED 14 [BORN ABOUT 1842], LEGITIMATE DAUGHTER OF THE MASON AUGUSTINUS BABIĆ, DIED OF A WASTING FEVER AT SENJ ON 20 DECEMBER 1856, WITH THE SACRAMENTS, BURIED AT S. VITUS — an entry of the Latin-language 1856 pages of the Senj death register (Knjiga Mertvih, Br. 1118); the mother is not named
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.