Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Michael Babić infant died Senj September 1850
Death, 29 September 1850, Senj — MICHAEL BABIĆ, 7 DAYS OLD, DIED AT SENJ ON 29 SEPTEMBER 1850, BURIED AT S. PETAR — an entry of the Croatian-language death register of Senj 1849–58 (Knjiga Mertvih, Br. 1118); the parents are not named.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- death
- Date
- 29 September 1850
- Place
- Senj
- Citation
- (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 545, right-hand page, 1850 September, entry 120 on 545R: «1850. dana 29 Rujna preminu Michael Babić, 7 dana, i bi zakopan u cimiteru svetoga Petra, na prici mene Tome Sladovicha kapelana.» The Croatian-language death register of Senj for 1849–1858 (Knjiga Mertvih od God. 1849, Državni arhiv Zagreb, Zbirka matičnih knjiga Br. 1118), image 545 right page, entry 120. Read at full page scale (about 1x; the name with its accent and the age clear). An infant born about 22 September 1850; the Maria Babić, aged 7, who died on 7 July of the same year (image 542L, entry 79) may be a sibling — a reading, the register names no parents (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md
The register page
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 545, right-hand page, 1850 September, entry 120 on 545R.
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
MICHAEL BABIĆ, 7 DAYS OLD, DIED AT SENJ ON 29 SEPTEMBER 1850, BURIED AT S. PETAR — an entry of the Croatian-language death register of Senj 1849–58 (Knjiga Mertvih, Br. 1118); the parents are not named
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.