The Blažević Archive
Read out of a register, and not in the family tree

Matia Urolla of Zastva

Marriage, 2 December 1736, Senj — A MATIA UROLLA [URODA?] OF ZASTVA, A GROOM AT SENJ ON 2 DECEMBER 1736, marrying Jelena, daughter of a Jure R[…]ra of Klana; the surname is written «Urolla» (or «Vrolla») and the place Zastva is not identified. NOT shown to be any Uroda/Vroda of Karlobag or Šibenik.

The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it. The whole list, and why it exists →

What the register says

Event
marriage
Date
2 December 1736
Place
Senj
Citation
(1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 13, right-hand page, see the entry quoted: «Na 2 xbra Ja plovan Kuhacevich zakupih u sti Matrimoniy Matia Urolla od Zastva shherom Jure R[...]ra od Klane imenom Jelena, polak nihovih Atestaciy [dopuschenjem] Gna Arkizakna d. Cholich.» Read at about 5x; the surname is written Urolla (or Vrolla); the place Zastva is not identified (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md

The register page

Senj, 2 December 1736 — Matia Urolla of Zastva. The register page as read: image 13, right-hand page, see the entry quoted.
Senj, 2 December 1736 — Matia Urolla of Zastva
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 13, right-hand page, see the entry quoted.
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note

How they attach to the line

A MATIA UROLLA [URODA?] OF ZASTVA, A GROOM AT SENJ ON 2 DECEMBER 1736, marrying Jelena, daughter of a Jure R[…]ra of Klana; the surname is written «Urolla» (or «Vrolla») and the place Zastva is not identified. NOT shown to be any Uroda/Vroda of Karlobag or Šibenik

The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.

← All 601 people found beside the tree