Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Marcus Krmpotić infant died Senj September 1824
Death, 16 September 1824, Senj — MARCUS KRMPOTIĆ [«KRAMPOTICH»], AN INFANT OF ABOUT 1 YEAR, SON OF MARCUS AND FRANCISCA KRMPOTIĆ, DIED AT SENJ ON 16 SEPTEMBER 1824 — a line of the Senj death register (Protocollum mortuorum 1820–1848).
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- death
- Date
- 16 September 1824
- Place
- Senj
- Citation
- (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 439, left-hand page, K section, page 49-50 (image 439 left page), first entry under «Mense Septembri»: «[Mense Septembri] 16° Septembris obiit Marcus filius Marci et Franciscae Krampotich, Anni circiter unius». The abbreviated one-line death entries of the 1820s (the register of Senj, Protocollum mortuorum 1820–1848, the K section): date, «obiit», the name, the age; the entry is the first under the month heading «Mense Septembri»; the year is 1824 by the heading «1825» that follows below it two entries later. Read at about 3x in a zoom of the line (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md
The register page
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 439, left-hand page, K section, page 49-50 (image 439 left page), first entry under «Mense Septembri».
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
MARCUS KRMPOTIĆ [«KRAMPOTICH»], AN INFANT OF ABOUT 1 YEAR, SON OF MARCUS AND FRANCISCA KRMPOTIĆ, DIED AT SENJ ON 16 SEPTEMBER 1824 — a line of the Senj death register (Protocollum mortuorum 1820–1848)
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.