Luca Bach of Karlobag
Baptism, October 1715, Karlobag — A SON LUCA OF A MIKULE BACH[…] — baptised at Karlobag in October 1715 (the index reads «Luca Bachi??», father «Mikule Bachi??», and files Luca as a woman); the surname is cut by the page edge after «Bach» and a first spelling is struck out, so it may be Bachi, Bačić or another name. If Bachi, a Bachi household at Karlobag long before the Caetanus Bachi of 1753.
What the register says
- Event
- baptism
- Date
- October 1715
- Place
- Karlobag
- Citation
- (1) Karlobag births 1691–1804 (FamilySearch, DGS film 005481648, index 1:1:QKMX-YL4S), left-hand page, first entry: «Ja pop Anton Hreljanović krstih sina Mikule [Babi — struck out] Bach[…], imenom Luca, komu bi kum Volfa Ivich» (snapshotted; read at about 5x). See notes/karlobag-marriage-1774-smojver-bacchi.md and /lines/#bacchi
The register page
![Karlobag, October 1715 — a son LUCA baptised to MIKULE BACH[…]; the index reads «Bachi??». The register page as read: left-hand page, first entry, headed «Na 2? oktobra 1715» (a Croatian-language entry by the priest Anton Hreljanović).](/snaps/karlobag-baptism-1715-10-luca-son-of-mikule-bach-line.jpg)
Karlobag births 1691–1804 (FamilySearch, DGS film 005481648; index record 1:1:QKMX-YL4S) · left-hand page, first entry, headed «Na 2? oktobra 1715» (a Croatian-language entry by the priest Anton Hreljanović).
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
A SON LUCA OF A MIKULE BACH[…] — baptised at Karlobag in October 1715 (the index reads «Luca Bachi??», father «Mikule Bachi??», and files Luca as a woman); the surname is cut by the page edge after «Bach» and a first spelling is struck out, so it may be Bachi, Bačić or another name. If Bachi, a Bachi household at Karlobag long before the Caetanus Bachi of 1753
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.