Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Franciscus Aloysius Kovačić widower groom of 1832 with Krmpotić witness
Marriage, 1832, Senj — FRANCISCUS ALOYSIUS KOVAČIĆ [«KOVACICH»], A WIDOWER OF 38 AT THE C.R. ARMY OFFICE, MARRYING NEPOMUCENA LOCHMER, 28, AT SENJ IN 1832 — the witness column names a Krmpotich «perceptionum tenens» beside the Capitaneus Judex Joannes Nepomuk Draganich de Drachenfeld.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- marriage
- Date
- 1832
- Place
- Senj
- Citation
- (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 277, right-hand page, see the entry quoted: «1832 25 [8bris?]. Viduum Franciscum Aloysium Kovacich ad Caesar.-Regium Officium Ligaminis Agens … dtd Zagrabiae 13 Aprilis 1832 N° 4999 et Nepomucenam Lochmer Virginem, filiam Joannis et Vincentiae Lochmer, domicilii ambo Segniae — dispensati in denuntiationibus»; ages 38 and 28; entry no. 4; witness column: «Joannes Nepo Draganich de Drachenfeld Capitaneus Judex Civitatis & Krmpotich perceptionum tenens». A Krmpotić in the witness column. Read at about 6x (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md
The register page
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 277, right-hand page, see the entry quoted.
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
FRANCISCUS ALOYSIUS KOVAČIĆ [«KOVACICH»], A WIDOWER OF 38 AT THE C.R. ARMY OFFICE, MARRYING NEPOMUCENA LOCHMER, 28, AT SENJ IN 1832 — the witness column names a Krmpotich «perceptionum tenens» beside the Capitaneus Judex Joannes Nepomuk Draganich de Drachenfeld
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.