Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Borić groom 1741
Marriage, January 1741, Senj — [..] BORIĆ [«BORICHA»] OF A PLACE READ «HRIZINA», A GROOM AT SENJ IN JANUARY 1741, marrying Barbara, daughter of a Lončan of Bakar — a reading of the Croatian-language entries of the Senj marriage register; the Christian name is lost in the gutter.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- marriage
- Date
- January 1741
- Place
- Senj
- Citation
- (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 26, left-hand page, image 26L, first entry of 1741: «Na 15 Jenvara Ja Pop Luka Kuhacevich Plovan zakupih u sti Matrimoniy [..] Boricha od hrizina skherom Loncan od Bakra imenom Barbarom, Kim bi [ja svidoka …].» The Senj marriage register 1734–1819 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P), image 26 left page, the first entry under the year 1741 (the priest is now Pop Luka Kuhacevich). Read in the STRIP PASS at page scale; the first words of the line are lost in the gutter of the book (the groom's Christian name is not seen), and the place after «od» is read as «hrizina» with a query. Borić is a listed surname (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md
The register page
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 26, left-hand page, image 26L, first entry of 1741.
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
[..] BORIĆ [«BORICHA»] OF A PLACE READ «HRIZINA», A GROOM AT SENJ IN JANUARY 1741, marrying Barbara, daughter of a Lončan of Bakar — a reading of the Croatian-language entries of the Senj marriage register; the Christian name is lost in the gutter
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.