Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Andreas Perpić aged 70 died Senj October 1834
Death, 6 October 1834, Senj — ANDREAS PERPIĆ [«PERPICK»; THE SURNAME IS READ WITH A QUERY], AGED 70 [BORN ABOUT 1764], DIED OF DEBILITY AT SENJ ON 6 OCTOBER 1834, WITH THE SACRAMENTS, BURIED AT S. VITUS — a row of the P section of the Senj death register.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- death
- Date
- 6 October 1834
- Place
- Senj
- Citation
- (1) Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images), image 475, right-hand page, image 475R, entry 27: «1834 die 6 Octobris: Andreas Perpick, 70, Debilitas Virium, provisus, Ad S. Vitum, Biancini? Coop., N° 27.» One of the tabular rows of the Senj death register (Matricula Defunctorum 1820–1848, the P section; FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P), image 475 right page, entry 27. Read in the SECOND PASS at about 2x of a third of the page (the first pass at page scale had flagged this entry as a possible Prpić). A man born about 1764; the surname's second half is written «-pick»/«-pich» in a looped hand, so Perpić is a reading with a query (snapshotted; read at about 6x). See notes/senj-marriage-volume-walk.md
The register page
Senj marriages (Vjenčani) 1734–1819, 1820–1858 and deaths 1820–1858 (FamilySearch waypoint 9RK1-W3P, 592 images) · image 475, right-hand page, image 475R, entry 27.
Open the image in the viewer → · the working note
How they attach to the line
ANDREAS PERPIĆ [«PERPICK»; THE SURNAME IS READ WITH A QUERY], AGED 70 [BORN ABOUT 1764], DIED OF DEBILITY AT SENJ ON 6 OCTOBER 1834, WITH THE SACRAMENTS, BURIED AT S. VITUS — a row of the P section of the Senj death register
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.